Forum

I‘d just handle it narratively. … why not make it one roll for each member and compare successes?

That is more or less what we did, I think. I see we are on the same track here. Thanks for the fast reply!

The rules are quite clear, but occasionally we find them to be a bit clumsy to implement. I am interested to know how you handle situations like this one: One group member (human woman from Bree of the "healer" type) went mad and attacked the group, foremost a Barding and a dwarf, both acc...

… but I do not think that you should take both advantages. Either use the table OR replace it by a narrated advantage that fits the level of success and the circumstances.

Generally they are under copyright, as the imprints of the books show. Why not ask them officially?

That sounds eminently reasonable. Thank you!

This touches something we also were not quite clear about: Is the adventurer required to engage an enemy? Or is it possible to stand aside (i.e. being neither in melee nor backward stance) to perform one of the alternative actions (intimidate foe, rally comrades, protect companion)? From the rules i...

If the suspect magic, they can use the "study magical items" undertaking (fellowship phase). If they do not have a clue they could carry the items with them without ever suspecting their magic – until it reveals itself, doubtlessly in an inconvenient manner and moment.

6 each - no upgrade beyond that ist possible.

Had we but known that a German was edition coming … too late now.

Is it because you can increase a 0 in theory which isn’t what the Eye is meant for?

Yes, that is what I meant.