Questions about Vond and adventure site placement
Posted: Fri 11 Apr 2025, 03:25
I'm preparing to run my first session of the Raven's Purge campaign in the next few weeks, so I have been reading through the GM's Guide and the Raven's Purge book to get a good idea of what I'm up against (I've only ran a few D&D 5E one shots before, so a new system and a full prewritten campaign is a big change). My initial impression was that you would place the stickers over an adventure site marker on the map. So The Hollows would be placed on any village adventure site that was also next to a river. Vond is a fortress, and we know it was built to guard Shadowgate Pass, so it makes a lot of sense to place it at E38. However, a passage in Raven's Purge contradicts this. It says "The fortress of Vond should be placed in a hexagon on the map with the terrain type RUINS. the obvious choice for the location of Vond is Alderstone." This means you wouldn't place the Vond sticker on a pre-marked castle adventure site. This raises many questions.
I know that no two games are supposed to be the exact same, so I can do whatever I want and it won't be wrong. But I'd love to know if anyone else figured out what was going on with these Vond/Alderstone inconsistencies. Or if these are all really silly questions because there's an obvious answer I happened to miss.
- Is this breaking the rule, or can adventure site stickers always be put on any hex even if there isn't an adventure site already marked there?
- If Vond is supposed to be placed in RUINS terrain like in Alderstone, what is the castle adventure site at E38 supposed to be?
- Was Alderstone built on top of and around Vond after it was taken by Alvagard, or was Alderstone a full city before The Man Flood of 825 AS?
I know that no two games are supposed to be the exact same, so I can do whatever I want and it won't be wrong. But I'd love to know if anyone else figured out what was going on with these Vond/Alderstone inconsistencies. Or if these are all really silly questions because there's an obvious answer I happened to miss.