Think I responded in a different thread to you, but for folks polking around in this subforum, I think this is what's going
I think like a lot of publishers, they're doing a serious look into the reality and ramifications of whatever may be happening with WotC's 1.0a to 1.1 moves. The present OGL is tied into their SRD for reasons I don't fully understand but a lot of publishers of Free League's size are in the same situation. Anyway, there are OGL and Community Content subforums here where folks developing or interested in folks developing material using the YZE SRD post. Apparently FL took down their OGL to review and assess (see posts by Tomas in those forums). It's my sense they want to protect their own interests and projects, and autonomy, as publishers while also maintaining what I feel is a very strong community of people making use of FL's SRD and Community Content permissions.
Short version, I think wait and see. LOTR is a significant license in its own right, and I think publishers are prioritizing ensuring the best conditions for the next ten years rather than meeting immediate community concern with answers that may shift given how this whole OGL thing ultimately plays out.
In other words, I think things are still being sorted out on the business/licensing/legal side of things. It seems to a lot of creators, D&D 5e or 5.5 or what I sometimes call CD PROJEKT D&D 2024 GOLD edition may not play as nice as 5e has during its earlier lifecycle, a lot of rash choices and "commitments" are being said in social media by players and smaller developers, but I think established companies are being very deliberative, and consequently very quiet.