Forum

I quite like the idea that at L3 you roll for crit twice, choose which one you want and can then reverse the roll using L2

We have removed lucky and exekutioner 3. Because They are kind of too strong and they remove the randomness of a serious injury.

All my players have lucky 2 and that is quite enough for the vast majority of cases

I quite like the idea that at L3 you roll for crit twice, choose which one you want and can then reverse the roll using L2

Isn't that L2?

I quite like the idea that at L3 you roll for crit twice, choose which one you want and can then reverse the roll using L2

Isn't that L2?

L3 : you choose the numbers freely

I quite like the idea that at L3 you roll for crit twice, choose which one you want and can then reverse the roll using L2

Isn't that L2?

L3 : you choose the numbers freely

Bold emphasis is mine. That's L2. So L3 has to be better than that.

Isn't that L2?

L3 : you choose the numbers freely

Bold emphasis is mine. That's L2. So L3 has to be better than that.

No it doesn't. It just has to add to it. If you then allow the player to move the result 1 step up or down the table from where ever it lands you give the player a choice of 3 different results.

L3 : you choose the numbers freely

Bold emphasis is mine. That's L2. So L3 has to be better than that.

No it doesn't. It just has to add to it. If you then allow the player to move the result 1 step up or down the table from where ever it lands you give the player a choice of 3 different results.

That's great. No disagreements there. I'm just saying that the commenter simply repeated what L2 was. There needs to be an iteration, whatever it is.