User avatar
Fenhorn
Moderator
Posts: 1507
Joined: Thu 24 Apr 2014, 15:03
Location: The Pearl of Lake Vänern.

Re: Errata for published game

Sun 23 Jun 2019, 10:23

In the Player’s Guide in the rules for attacks on the player’s stronghold the table of defense modifiers state that if the PCs join in the defense it is +1 defense point no matter how many PCs participate.  However, later in the text after the table it says the bonus is +1 per PC.  And then the following example says the same as the table.  Which is correct?  I would be inclined to go with the table since it is corroborated by the example, but I just want to be sure.
I would go with the table and the example, otherwise the players would have an enormous impact on stronghold battles.
“I’d say thistles, but nobody listens to me, anyway.” - Eeyore
 
User avatar
faun
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu 23 May 2019, 20:02
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Errata for published game

Fri 28 Jun 2019, 09:55

Is there a current PDF for the errata?
 
User avatar
Fenhorn
Moderator
Posts: 1507
Joined: Thu 24 Apr 2014, 15:03
Location: The Pearl of Lake Vänern.

Re: Errata for published game

Fri 28 Jun 2019, 10:12

Is there a current PDF for the errata?
No, this thread is it.
“I’d say thistles, but nobody listens to me, anyway.” - Eeyore
 
User avatar
faun
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu 23 May 2019, 20:02
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Errata for published game

Sun 30 Jun 2019, 08:50

Is there a current PDF for the errata?
No, this thread is it.
Found one that had been started, updated it with the info found here in the thread. Its editable if others find more please add, suggestions welcome on the wording of edits..
Forbidden Lands - Fan Errata
 
User avatar
faun
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu 23 May 2019, 20:02
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Errata for published game

Sun 30 Jun 2019, 08:52

Just made a little summary:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fGq ... sp=sharing

Editoring / Changes are welcome!


And here are two more recommendation, but might be my personal feel:

Page 77
Lucky Rank 2
As per rank 1, but you can also reverse the D66 roll for the critical injury – a roll of16 becomes 61, for example.

“a roll of 61 becomes 16” would be better suit Lucky

Page 105
Example:
Later on in the journey, Tyrgar gets in trouble again. The dwarf is hit by an angry minotaur’s greataxe. The attack inflicts a whopping 4 points of damage. Tyrgar wears chainmail and an open helmet, for a total Armor Rating of 8.
He rolls eight Gear Dice and gets one 6 and one 1.Tyrgar suffers 3 points of strength damage but his result couldn´t prevent the whole damage, so his Armour is decreased by 1.Tyrgar chooses to let his chainmail take the hit and its Armor Rating is thus decreased to 5.
For this to follow the written example in the paragraphs it should be written like this:
Page 106
Example:
Later on in the journey, Tyrgar gets in trouble again. The dwarf is hit by an angry minotaur’s greataxe. The attack inflicts a whopping 4 points of damage. Tyrgar wears chainmail and an open helmet, for a total Armor Rating of 8. He rolls eight Gear Dice and gets one 6 and one l. Tyrgar suffers 3 points of damage and Armor Rating is decreased by 1. Tyrgar chooses to let his chainmail take the hit and its Armor Rating is thus decreased to 5. Should be “Tyrgar may choose to take the 3 points of damage to his strength and his gear is reduced to 7 dice (4 strength damage -1 gear success and 1 damage to armor due to bane ) or no damage to his strength and his gear is reduced to 4 dice (4 damage to gear - 1 gear success + 1 bane). Banes do not count only if the armor absorbs all the damage.
 
User avatar
Fenhorn
Moderator
Posts: 1507
Joined: Thu 24 Apr 2014, 15:03
Location: The Pearl of Lake Vänern.

Re: Errata for published game

Sat 13 Jul 2019, 23:11

Just made a little summary:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fGq ... sp=sharing

Editoring / Changes are welcome!


And here are two more recommendation, but might be my personal feel:

Page 77
Lucky Rank 2
As per rank 1, but you can also reverse the D66 roll for the critical injury – a roll of16 becomes 61, for example.

“a roll of 61 becomes 16” would be better suit Lucky

Page 105
Example:
Later on in the journey, Tyrgar gets in trouble again. The dwarf is hit by an angry minotaur’s greataxe. The attack inflicts a whopping 4 points of damage. Tyrgar wears chainmail and an open helmet, for a total Armor Rating of 8.
He rolls eight Gear Dice and gets one 6 and one 1.Tyrgar suffers 3 points of strength damage but his result couldn´t prevent the whole damage, so his Armour is decreased by 1.Tyrgar chooses to let his chainmail take the hit and its Armor Rating is thus decreased to 5.
For this to follow the written example in the paragraphs it should be written like this:
Page 106
Example:
Later on in the journey, Tyrgar gets in trouble again. The dwarf is hit by an angry minotaur’s greataxe. The attack inflicts a whopping 4 points of damage. Tyrgar wears chainmail and an open helmet, for a total Armor Rating of 8. He rolls eight Gear Dice and gets one 6 and one l. Tyrgar suffers 3 points of damage and Armor Rating is decreased by 1. Tyrgar chooses to let his chainmail take the hit and its Armor Rating is thus decreased to 5. Should be “Tyrgar may choose to take the 3 points of damage to his strength and his gear is reduced to 7 dice (4 strength damage -1 gear success and 1 damage to armor due to bane ) or no damage to his strength and his gear is reduced to 4 dice (4 damage to gear - 1 gear success + 1 bane). Banes do not count only if the armor absorbs all the damage.
The example with Tyrgar is actually correct as it is. This was discussed here:
viewtopic.php?f=77&t=4916
“I’d say thistles, but nobody listens to me, anyway.” - Eeyore
 
User avatar
Fenhorn
Moderator
Posts: 1507
Joined: Thu 24 Apr 2014, 15:03
Location: The Pearl of Lake Vänern.

Re: Errata for published game

Sat 13 Jul 2019, 23:32

In this thread

viewtopic.php?f=77&t=4950

it was pointed out that the duration of the minstrel's talent Warcry Rank 1 is a little bit unclear. The Warcry rank 1 and 2 should have the same duration as it is described in the rank 2 text.
“I’d say thistles, but nobody listens to me, anyway.” - Eeyore
 
muk83
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon 12 Aug 2019, 14:03

Re: Errata for published game

Mon 12 Aug 2019, 14:18

Players handbook page 180

Healing
A typical village healer has Wits 4 and skill level 2 in Healing.

But healing uses Empathy instead of wits. Should it say "Emapthy 4 and skill...."
 
fedev80
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun 04 Aug 2019, 20:53

Re: Errata for published game

Wed 14 Aug 2019, 05:14

Players handbook page 180

Healing
A typical village healer has Wits 4 and skill level 2 in Healing.

But healing uses Empathy instead of wits. Should it say "Emapthy 4 and skill...."
Yes it should.... may be that remained from a time during development when healing was associated to Wits, which makes sense.
 
User avatar
Tomas
Site Admin
Posts: 4474
Joined: Fri 08 Apr 2011, 11:31

Re: Errata for published game

Thu 19 Sep 2019, 13:52

Hello!

We have now created PDF errata sheets compiling the clarifications and changes in the second printing of the Forbidden Lands core set. You can download them here:
Fria Ligan
GZIP: Off