• 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
 
Dunheved
Topic Author
Posts: 494
Joined: Wed 11 Mar 2020, 02:07
Location: UK

Re: Proof reading the new materials?

Wed 13 Oct 2021, 14:26

For the collection of Harlath.

Page 200 Core rules
Carn Dum
fourth line of this paragraph has
" even though the Witch King himself has yet to returned home"

clearly the word should be simply "return" here
 
User avatar
Harlath
Posts: 518
Joined: Sun 19 Jul 2020, 10:40

Re: Proof reading the new materials?

Wed 13 Oct 2021, 15:17

For the collection of Harlath.

Page 200 Core rules
Carn Dum
fourth line of this paragraph has
" even though the Witch King himself has yet to returned home"

clearly the word should be simply "return" here
Good spot, will add to the Google doc tonight! :)
 
User avatar
Harlath
Posts: 518
Joined: Sun 19 Jul 2020, 10:40

Re: Proof reading the new materials?

Sun 24 Oct 2021, 08:59

Added another minor issue to the google doc. This one looks like a leftover from previous drafts as it is close to the 1e text (where Wisdom/Valour influenced Tolerance).

"WISDOM or VALOUR affect the game in several ways: they influence social interactions, provide Player-heroes with special abilities and superior equipment, and allow them to resist the dangerous influence of the Shadow (see The Shadow, page 136)." - p78. Presumably first part on social interactions is an outdated reference to 1e/earlier drafts, as wisdom/valour no longer influence social encounters
 
Dunheved
Topic Author
Posts: 494
Joined: Wed 11 Mar 2020, 02:07
Location: UK

Re: Proof reading the new materials?

Thu 28 Oct 2021, 23:16

Again Harlath, your collection can have this little contradiction in the Patrons section


Page 216 CIRDAN AS A PATRON paragraph third/fourth line says the 5 wizards arrives three thousand years ago ( incorrect time)
While page 217 at the top of the right hand column, the second line declares that the Wizards arrives two thousand years ago (about right)
 
User avatar
Harlath
Posts: 518
Joined: Sun 19 Jul 2020, 10:40

Re: Proof reading the new materials?

Fri 29 Oct 2021, 12:04

Many thanks, added that too. :)
 
Otaku-sempai
Posts: 598
Joined: Wed 15 Apr 2020, 15:35
Location: Western New York

Re: Proof reading the new materials?

Fri 29 Oct 2021, 17:03

Again Harlath, your collection can have this little contradiction in the Patrons section


Page 216 CIRDAN AS A PATRON paragraph third/fourth line says the 5 wizards arrives three thousand years ago ( incorrect time)
While page 217 at the top of the right hand column, the second line declares that the Wizards arrives two thousand years ago (about right)
.
In addition, we can only apply the year 1000 (Third Age) date, definitively, to Gandalf, Saruman and Radagast. Information about the Blue Wizards is contradictory. The Blues might have been sent to Middle-earth around the year 1600 of the Second Age, perhaps in the company of the returning Glorfindel.

In addition, we learn in The Nature of Middle-earth that the Istari might have been sent to Middle-earth previously in the First Age to safeguard the Eldar before the undertaking of the Great Journey. But that isn't something that needs to be addressed in TOR.
#FideltyToTolkien
 
User avatar
Harlath
Posts: 518
Joined: Sun 19 Jul 2020, 10:40

Re: Proof reading the new materials?

Mon 08 Nov 2021, 19:29

With thanks to a keen eyed fan on Discord, added the below:

"P169 “In general terms, the Eye Awareness rating of a Company is based on the number of Player-heroes in the group” - refers to “number” of player heroes when this doesn't seem to be a factor in Eye Awareness anymore. A relic of Alpha rules?"

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1w7S ... nnDFI/edit
 
User avatar
Narl
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun 29 Nov 2020, 05:08
Location: Misty Mountains

Re: Proof reading the new materials?

Tue 09 Nov 2021, 08:11

P 199 - Orc-poison Fell Ability is different from the same ability on page 150.
 
baldrick0712
Posts: 672
Joined: Fri 28 May 2021, 12:29

Re: Proof reading the new materials?

Tue 09 Nov 2021, 21:18

I find it quite amusing that they changed "Search" to "Scan", pointing out that "Scan" was used in the source material, and then appended an example to the "Scan" description that has the word "search" in it but no mention of "scan". Why not quote the passage from the source material that has "scan" in it? (see p64).
 
Byrax
Posts: 1094
Joined: Fri 08 Jan 2016, 10:42
Location: Mythic North

Re: Proof reading the new materials?

Tue 09 Nov 2021, 21:33

Funny, just looked at this (fan-created char sheet) and I do not like the replacement of Search to Scan at all. Same with Enhearten from Inspire.

EDIT: Sorry, this post did not contribute at all to finding typos etc. Keep up the good work guys! Looking forward to the final product!
Last edited by Byrax on Thu 11 Nov 2021, 04:36, edited 1 time in total.
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests