Anyway, feedback. Is there a reason why you decided to move some sub-concepts under different concepts? Also why not just use the existing concepts and add new sub-concepts to them?
Brains
- Brains is a bit silly name for a concept. Academic or Scientist would sound much better.
- Scientist is a bit too broad term to be a sub-concept.
- Prospector definitely belongs under Trailblazer.
- Looks more or less fine to me.
- Seems like a good concept, especially if the gear selection contains things like amulets and charms that showcase the concept's superstitious nature.
- It isn't necessary to have Fallen and Sith as sub-concepts as you can portray them using the other concepts (e.g. Sith Marauder would be functionally identical to a Jedi Guardian).
- If you gave Sentinel Infiltration instead of Endure, the sub-concept could also be used to portray Sith Assassins.
- Nobles can be portrayed by choosing the privileged upbringing, so I would call the sub-concept Politician or such.
- I would say that Officer belongs under Soldier concept.
- Looks more or less fine to me.
- It isn't necessary to have a Gunner sub-concept, especially as gunners aren't really pilots themselves.
- Looks more or less fine to me.
- It isn't necessary to have a Weapon specialist sub-concept as it can be handled with suitable gear selection.
- Gunslinger would fit Scoundrel better.
- It isn't necessary to have both Engineer and Mechanic.
- Outlaw Tech isn't necessary as you can portray a criminal techie with some other sub-concept.
- Dockworker doesn't really fit in thematically with the other sub-concepts.
- You might as well call the concept Warrior as it seems to be about melee combat.
- Deckhand and Trader don't fit in thematically with the actual trailblazers.